Comments on: What to Expect When You Write about Revelation

by: George P. Wood

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:20:03 +0000

Thanks, Steve! I fixed the link, and I’ll think about suggesting to “Michael” that he replace his commentary with mine. His site is filled with pretty weird stuff, IMHO.

by: Steve

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:13:53 +0000

George, the link does not work–there is some prefix “blocked::blocked::” which must be removed for it to work.

Bizarre stuff. Suggesting you remove your commentary is more than a bit aggressive. But it fits the mold of the tripe found on the blog.

I suggest that you do not remove your commentary, George, and tell him to replace HIS with YOURS, since yours is certainly much nearer the truth than his.

by: George P. Wood

Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:01:32 +0000

Brian:

I used Osborne’s commentary, together with Mounce’s, but I did not use Keener’s. I read both Theology of Revelation and Climax of Prophecy by Bauckham. I found a commentary by Steve Gregg to be very interesting. It was a parallel commentary, noting how each of the major schools of thought interprets each chapter of Revelation.

George

by: Brian

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 21:17:48 +0000

Wow.

I enjoyed getting your comments on revelation though I wondered if you had read Osborne, Keener or even R Baukaum’s Theology of Revelation.

-Brian