Archive for February, 2007

Are Christians Haters? (1 John 2:9-11)

Thursday, February 15th, 2007
 
Listen to The Daily Word online.
 
I once had a conversation with a Christian man about interracial marriage. He strongly opposed such marriages and argued that our church should not publicly condone them. (As part of a series on marriage, we had photographed couples in the church and showed their pictures during a worship service. Several of the couples were interracial.) I replied that there was no room in the church for bigotry because God created us all equally and offers salvation to all freely.
 
Which one of us was right?
 
The man offered a laundry list of arguments about the evils of interracial marriage. (They were a hodge-podge of bad logic and false facts.) Noticeably lacking from his list was any biblical argument. And indeed, it would impossible for a Christian to root bigotry in the Bible. Consider, as just one example, 1 John 2:9-11:
 
Anyone who claims to be in the light but hates his brother is still in the darkness. Whoever loves his brother lives in the light, and there is nothing in him to make him stumble. But whoever hates his brother is in the darkness and walks around in the darkness; he does not know where he is going, because the darkness has blinded him.
 
Hatred is incompatible with Christian fellowship. It is incompatible with God’s character, for as 1 John 4:8 puts it, “God is love.” It is incompatible with God’s desire to save us, for as 1 John 4:10 says, “This is love: not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his son as an atoning sacrifice for our sins.” And 1 John 2:2 makes sure we understand that Christ is “the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only ours but also for the sins of the whole world.” Finally, hatred is incompatible with God’s desire to sanctify us, that is, to replace our sin with holiness.
 
Unfortunately, some people who claim to be Christians are haters. In The Scandal of the Evangelical Conscience, Ronald J. Sider reminds his readers that “during the civil rights movement, when mainline Protestants and Jews joined African Americans in their historic struggle for freedom and equality, evangelical leaders were almost entirely absent.” And he quotes the alarming conclusion of a study of evangelicals and race, which says, “White evangelicalism likely does more to perpetuate the racialized society than to reduce it.”[1]
 
If the conclusion of that study is accurate, then many professing Christians are still stuck in sin. They have not moved from darkness to light in their actions. They have not experienced the sanctifying power of God, his ability to liberate us from hatred and for love. And that, quite frankly, should alarm us.
 
Christianity, after all, is not just a creed to confess. It is also an ethic to be lived. Indeed, if John is to be believed, the truthfulness of our confession is demonstrated by the integrity of our lives. Christ did not hate, he loved; and if we claim to follow him, we too must love, not hate.
P.S. Check out Part 2 of my blog series, The God Delusion, here.




[1] Ronald J. Sider, The Scandal of the Evangelical Conscience (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2005), 25, 26.

The Old New Command (1 John 2:7-8)

Wednesday, February 14th, 2007
 
Listen to The Daily Word online.
 
When I was in fifth grade, my best friend Darren Norris gave me J. R. R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings for my birthday. In the fall season, when the rain begins to pour, you can find me in an easy chair, re-reading the pages of my second favorite book. Every time, I find something new to ponder in this old, familiar story.
 
There is an older, more familiar story that is my favorite. It is the gospel, the good news about Jesus. In 1 John 2:7-8, John writes about this story, which despite its age, always seems fresh, contemporary, and relevant. Here’s what John writes:
 
Dear friends, I am not writing you a new command but an old one, which you have had since the beginning. This old command is the message you have heard. Yet I am writing you a new command; its truth is seen in him and you, because the darkness is passing and the true light is already shining.
 
Notice several things about what John writes:
 
First, he addresses his readers as friends. The Greek word is agapetoi, literally, “beloved.” To whom are these people beloved? The most obvious answer is to John. He is the senior Christian leader in their community. But John’s love for them is not merely personal, it is spiritual. He loves them because they are loved, first and foremost, by God. It is a loving God who draws us into fellowship with himself and with one another. The church, then, is the beloved community.
 
Second, John reminds them that his teaching is old. According to 1 John 2:18-19, a group of false teachers had seceded from the church and was trying to convince other church members to do the same. Evidently, these secessionists argued that John’s teaching was “new.” John replies by pointing out that his “command” and “message” are “old,” the same command and message he taught at “the beginning” of his ministry. First John 3:23 summarizes both the message and the command: “to believe in the name of [God’s] Son, Jesus Christ, and to love one another as he commanded us.” This is basic Christianity, the old message of Jesus and his apostles.
 
But third, while old, this basic Christianity is also always new. John seems to contradict himself when he says, “I am writing you a new command.” How can the same message be both old and new? Simple. Its origin is old, but its application is new. Every time a person believes in the old story of Jesus, he or she begins to live a new life. In powerful metaphorical language, John writes, “the darkness is passing and the true light is already shining.” Today, I will see the 13,795th sunrise of my lifetime, and it will be beautiful. But more sublime is the change that takes place in life because of the rising of God’s Son, who spreads the light of salvation over the darkness of sin.
 
Today, make sure to see the Son rise on you.
P.S. And check out my new blog series on The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins.

Friends of God?

Tuesday, February 13th, 2007

Alexandra Pelosi has a new documentary about evangelical Christians, Friends of God. Its title is derived from an Israel Houghton worship song that forms the background music for much of the film. Although the film has drawn the predictable ire of evangelical groups such as Focus on the Family, Michael Linton suggests that it reveals some real weaknesses in evangelical culture. Make sure to read his lengthy post at the First Things blog.

Behavior, the Test of Belief (1 John 2:3-6)

Tuesday, February 13th, 2007
 
Listen to The Daily Word online.
 
One of the most common complaints about us Christians is that we are hypocrites. We believe one way but behave another. Unfortunately, this complaint is often true.
 
In 2005, Ron Sider published The Scandal of the Evangelical Conscience, which sifted through numerous studies on the belief-behavior gap of American Christians. Here’s his conclusion:
 
Whether the issue is divorce, materialism, sexual promiscuity, racism, physical abuse in marriage, or neglect of a biblical worldview, the polling data point to widespread, blatant disobedience of clear biblical demands on the part of people who allegedly are evangelical, born-again Christians.
 
What are the causes of this “widespread, blatant disobedience”? Several come to my mind very quickly: Preachers who don’t talk about ethics and morality, church leaders who don’t provide accountability for their members, a greater desire for personal pleasure than principled living, an ingrained sin nature that’s just plain hard to eradicate, and a pervasive easy-believism among people in the pews.
 
John takes aim at easy-believism in 1 John 2:3-6, so let’s focus on that cause. Here’s what he writes:
 
We know that we have come to know him if we obey his commands. The man who says, “I know him,” but does not do what he commands is a liar, and the truth is not in him. But if anyone obeys his word, God’s love is truly made complete in him. This is how we know we are in him: Whoever claims to live in him must walk as Jesus did.
 
Easy-believism begins with a claim to know God. And it is compatible with knowing quite a bit of theological information about God. But scratch beneath the surface of that knowledge and you’ll see that it’s only head deep. It doesn’t affect the heart and its desires nor the hand and its behaviors. That’s why it’s easy. Anyone can acquire information about God—whether trivial or profound in nature. True knowledge of God is not just knowledge about him, however; it is knowledge of him, it is a life-changing, personal relationship. And that relationship changes the way you behave.
 
John states his basic principle in verse 3: “We know that we have come to know him if we obey his commands.” The test of belief in God, in other words, is godly behavior. If we have faith in God, then his power should begin working in our lives to root out sin and plant seeds of holiness.
 
This is not just a passive process for us, however. When God saves us by grace, he asks us to do some work. John writes, “if anyone obeys his word, God’s love is truly made complete in him.” In Greek, “the love of God” may refer to God’s love for us or our love for God. While the NIV opts for the former, I think the latter is the more appropriate sense here. Our obedience to God helps us love him more.
 
The primary example of such perfect love is Jesus, of course. He is the model for our lives, which is why John writes: “Whoever claims to live in him must walk as Jesus did.” Jesus was not an easy believer. There was no belief-behavior gap in his life. And if we follow him, that gap should start to close in our lives as well.

The God Delusion?

Friday, February 9th, 2007

thegoddelusion.jpgPeruse the bestsellers table at any Borders or Barnes & Noble and you are likely to see a copy of The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins, which argues that belief in God is both false and pernicious. Next Wednesday, February 14th, I’m going to begin to write a blog series on my reactions to Dawkins’ arguments, taking them one chapter at a time. Although Dawkins is a world-renowned scientist, ardent defender of evolutionary naturalism, and excellent literary stylist, I find his arguments against belief in God generally unpersuasive and on occasion (such as when he writes about historical Jesus research) just plain wrong. In my series, I hope to provide reasonable counter-arguments. If you’ve got questions about belief in God or knows someone who does, this may be a good series for you to read.

Liberator, Defender, Sacrifice (1 John 2:1-2)

Friday, February 9th, 2007
 
Listen to The Daily Word online.
 
Sin has a powerful grip on us humans, which we do not have the power to break free of. Only God has that kind of power. So how does he break the grip of sin on our lives? Answer: through the death of Jesus Christ.
 
We find a brief description of how God overcomes sin through Christ in 1 John 2:1-2:
 
My dear children, I write this to you so that you will not sin. But if anybody does sin, we have one who speaks to the Father in our defense—Jesus Christ, the Righteous One. He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.
 
First, God announces his intention to overcome sin. When John says, “I write this to you so that you will not sin,” he is not merely stating his personal opinion. Rather, as an apostle of Jesus Christ, he is proclaiming a truth of the gospel. Indeed, according to 1 John 3:8, “He who does what is sinful is of the devil, because the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the devil’s work.” But Christ’s appearing was also constructive. According to 1 John 5:18, “We know that anyone born of God does not continue to sin; the one who was born of God [that is, Jesus] keeps him safe, and the evil one cannot harm him.”
 
From all this mention of the devil, you might conclude that the problem of sin is a problem of victimization. We are innocents who have been enslaved by an evil power. That is part of the biblical message. But the Bible also uses a legal metaphor to describe the problem of sin. We are criminal defendants—victimizers—who are guilty as charged, and God is the Judge in whose hands our sentence rests. Building on this legal metaphor, John writes that Jesus is “one who speaks to the Father in our defense.” Jesus Christ, in other words, is the advocate who makes the case for our innocence.
 
But how can Christ make a case for the innocence of his clients when they are patently guilty? It is here that John introduces a third metaphor, which is religious in nature. Jesus, he writes, is “the atoning sacrifice for our sins, not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.” In the ancient world, religious worship often included the sacrifice of an animal. The worshiper laid his hand on the animal’s head, symbolically transferring his guilt to it, and then the animal was killed in ritual punishment for the person’s sins. John uses this metaphor to describe what Jesus actually did. Through his death on the cross, Christ exchanged his innocence for our guilt so that we might get out from under the grip of sin.
 
In summary, Jesus Christ is our Liberator, Defender, and Sacrifice. That is how God overcomes the power of sin in our lives.

Two Mistakes about Sin (1 John 1:8-10)

Thursday, February 8th, 2007
 
Listen to The Daily Word online.
 
When it comes to the issue of ongoing sin in the life of the believer, Christians often make one of two mistakes: either they claim an easy victory over sin or they concede an early defeat to it. A careful reading of 1 John 1:8-10 is the cure for both mistakes.
 
In the history of Christian theology, people who claim an easy victory over sin have come to be known as perfectionists. They believe that God’s Word and Spirit are so powerfully at work in the life of the believer that he or she can attain sinlessness in this life. In 1 John 1:8-10, John refutes pretensions of perfection when he writes:
 
If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. If we claim we have not sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word has no place in our lives.
 
John’s argument is two-fold: First, perfectionism contradicts the truth about ourselves. We are sinners. Whether atheists, agnostics, spiritual seekers, or mature believers, “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,” according to Romans 3:23. Human sinfulness is both a biblical assertion about us, as well as an empirically verifiable fact. But who are the “we” John is writing to? It is tempting to claim that they are unbelievers, but that temptation should be resisted. The context of these verses demands that “we” includes us. John is writing to Christians about their ongoing sin.
 
Second, perfectionism contradicts the truth about God. If we claim perfection in this life, then we make God a “liar” and “his word has no place in our lives.” In Romans 3:9-18, the Apostle Paul quotes a litany of divinely inspired prophecies about human sinfulness. And this litany is about both unbelievers and believers. “Are we any better?” Paul asks. “Not at all!” If God tells the truth, if his word is to have any place in our lives, then we Christians must acknowledge that we are sinners.
 
But if an easy victory over sin is impossible, should we concede an early defeat to it? I once had an extended conversation with a very thoughtful young man who, if I understood him correctly, doubted that believers could make any progress in holiness in this life. While we should not underestimate the powerful grip sin has on us, we also should not underestimate the far more powerful grip God has on us through his Son, Jesus Christ.
 
The solution to sin is not anxiously striving for perfection or guiltily wallowing in defeat. Rather, the way out is confession: “If we confess our sins, [God] is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness.” How does he do this? According to 1 John 1:7, by “the blood of Jesus.”
 
More on how Jesus overcomes sin tomorrow.

Belong, Behaving, and Believing (1 John 1:6-7)

Wednesday, February 7th, 2007
 
Listen to The Daily Word online.
 
Many Americans claim to have a personal relationship with God, but how do we know whether they actually do?
 
First John offers two tests of belonging to God: behaving and believing. How we behave is an ethical test. First John 1:5-2:2, which we will begin studying today, is an example of such a test. How we believe is a theological test, and 1 John 2:20-23 and 4:1-3, which we will study later, are examples of it.
 
These tests of relationship with God are not only biblical, they are also common sense. Consider your own relationships. If you belong to an association of professionals—whether doctors, lawyers, or teachers—your behavior must conform to a professional code of conduct. Violate that code, and you will be kicked out of the group. Or if you are the best friend of someone, you will hold true beliefs about that person. By contrast, holding false beliefs about that person—not knowing their likes and dislikes, the names of their family members, etc.—probably indicates that you don’t know them as well as you think, if you know them at all. Similarly, belonging to God requires behaving like him and believing the truth about him.
 
As noted above, 1 John 1:5-2:2 offers an ethical test of relationship with God. Verse 5 tells us about God’s character: “God is light; in him there is no darkness at all.” Verses 6-7 go on to speak of the necessary connection between God’s character and the believer’s behavior:
 
If we claim to have fellowship with him yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not live by the truth. But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin.
 
The issue in these verses is the “claim” of “fellowship with [God].” According to John, this is a testable claim. If people make the claim “yet walk in darkness,” then their claim is empirically false. On the other hand, if people “walk in the light,” then that is evidence that they have “fellowship with one another” (i.e., the church) as well as “fellowship with [God].”
 
But what happens when we don’t behave like God, when we sin? And let’s be honest here, even life-long, spiritually mature Christians struggle with sin. Do we fall in and out of relationship with God? No, for as John puts it, “the blood of Jesus, [God’s] Son, purifies us from all sin.” We belong to God not because of what we have done for him, but because of what he has done for us through Christ.
 
But if this is the case, does the ethical test of relationship with God have any real force? If we belong to God regardless of past behavior, does future behavior matter? Absolutely! Christ’s death on the cross “purifies us from all sin.” It sets in motion the process by which our behavior begins to conform to God’s. If we belong to God, then we will behave like him. Or as John puts it, “walk in the light, as God is in the light.”

God Is Light (1 John 1:5)

Tuesday, February 6th, 2007
Listen to The Daily Word online.
 
When I was a boy, I was afraid of the dark. Who knew what bogeyman lurked in its shadows, or what under-the-bed monster went bump in the night? Not I. But I always knew the solution for my fears.
 
And what was the solution? God, obviously! Whenever I found myself trembling in bed with fear, I would pray to God or sing a hymn. (I admit I was a weird little kid.) Martin Luther’s A Mighty Fortress Is Our God was particularly effective in dispelling my fears, especially this lyric:
 
The Prince of Darkness grim, we tremble not for him;
His rage we can endure, for lo, his doom is sure,
One little word shall fell him.
 
There was (and still is) a great deal of comfort to be had from knowing that “the Prince of Darkness grim” is not strong enough to withstand “one little word” from God. As a boy facing monsters and bogeymen, and as a man worried about terrorists and suitcase nukes, such a truth helps keep my fears in perspective.
 
What is it about the dark that makes it so fearsome, or the light that makes it so welcome? For me, it is ignorance and knowledge, respectively. In the dark, we do not know because we cannot see; but in the light, we can both see and know. And that is why darkness and light are such spiritually suggestive metaphors. We do not know what evil the darkness hides, but in the light we see that goodness prevails.
 
Jesus evidently used the metaphors of darkness and light to describe our Heavenly Father. We do not find his usage of them in the Gospels, but 1 John 1:5 is quite clear that he used them nonetheless: “This is the message we have heard from him and declare to you: God is light; in him there is no darkness at all.”
 
Notice that Jesus engages in both positive and negative theology in this verse. Positively, “God is light.” Negatively, “in him there is no darkness at all.” These two statements amplify each other. God is not the first sliver of dawn, nor is darkness the gloaming. Rather, God is high noon in summer, and the darkness is pitch-black midnight on a cloudy, moonless night. They are the spiritual antitheses of one another.
 
According to I. Howard Marshall, light symbolizes both the “revelation and salvation” that God provides us, as well as the “holiness” he possesses and requires of us.[1] Psalm 119:105 captures the intimate connection between revelation and salvation when it says, “Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light for my path.” God reveals so that he can save.
 
But it is holiness that is paramount in 1 John 1:5, as the verses that follow (and which we will study later) make clear. God has no secret sins. He is neither monster nor bogeyman. He is the absolute contradiction of those terrorists who do violence in his name.
 
Knowing this, whether young or old, we can sleep in peace.
 




[1] I. Howard Marshall, The Epistles of John (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1978), 109.